The Hidden Problem with Many IEP Goals
Many IEP goals sound measurable… until progress reports are due. After chairing hundreds of CSE meetings, I’ve realized the problem often isn’t effort or compliance. It’s that teams don’t always have a clear system for turning present levels into measurable goals. In this article, I share a simple framework I use to help teams write goals that are easier to teach, monitor, and measure. Because good IEPs don’t come from working harder. They come from better systems.
Samantha Scaturro
3/16/20262 min read


Many IEP goals sound measurable... until progress reports are due.
By then, 8-10 weeks of valuable instructional data are gone. It isn't because teachers aren't working hard. It's because the system for using data isn't clear.
The Real Problem Isn't Lack of Data
In special education, we often assume that the problem is not enough data. In reality, it's just the opposite. Teachers collect data all day long... often even more data than they actually need. Without a clear system to analyze and apply that data, teams struggle to turn it into meaningful instructional decisions.
As a result, goals become difficult to measure. After chairing hundreds of CSE meetings, I found that this is often because they are based on:
Generic IEP Goal Banks
Missing of vague baseline data
Unclear "skills to increase"
Goals that describe activities (paying attention) instead of outcomes (improved comprehension using attention strategies)
When goals focus on activities rather than outcomes, progress becomes difficult to measure.
A Simple Framework for Writing Measurable Goals
When developing IEP goals, I follow a three-step process.
STEP 1: Identify the Skill Deficit
Start with present levels and baseline data. What is the student struggling with?
STEP 2: Identify the Skill to Increase
Ask yourself: What skill must the student develop to close this gap? This is the skill we will teach, practice, and measure.
STEP 3: Write the Goal Based on the Skill
IEP goals should measure the skill we want to build, not just the difficulty we want to fix.
Example
Baseline Data: During 15-minute independent work periods, the student remained engaged in the assigned task for an average of 4 minutes before becoming off task.
Deficit: Difficulty sustaining attention to academic tasks overtime.
Skill to Increase: Use self-monitoring strategies to maintain engagement with academic tasks.
Goal: During independent work periods, the student will use an explicitly taught self-monitoring strategy (i.e., checklist, timer, annotating, self-questioning) to compete assigned tasks within the allotted time in 4 out of 5 opportunities.
The 3-Question Test for Measurable Goals
Can we teach it? (Self-Monitoring Strategies - YES!)
Can we see it? (Completed Work - YES!)
Can we measure it? (# of Completed Work Assignments- YES!)
HINT: If the answer to any of these questions is no, the goal probably needs revision.
Why This Matters
When goals are written clearly:
Progress monitoring becomes easier
Instruction becomes more focused and student-centered
CSE meetings become more productive
Student progress becomes easier to communicate to families
Good IEPs don't come from working harder. They come from better systems.
This is exactly the work I do to support school districts. If you're interested in empowering your team to stop drowning in data and write stronger goals, please contact me at IEPALLYLLC@gmail.com for a free consultation.
